Module 8 Final Paper Draft
- DueSunday by9:59pm
- Points100
- Submittinga text entry box or a file upload
- Availableuntil Feb 2 at 9:59pm
Description:
Submit your rough draft of your Final Research paper for feedback.
Objectives:
- Upload your draft paper for peer review.
- Solicit feedback and utilize the input in your research paper.
Instructions:
Using proper APA format, submit your rough draft of your Final Research paper for feedback.
Assignment Submission:
- The use of outside resources is required, and all papers must be cited and written in APA format.
- Once you have completed the assignment, click the Submit Assignmentoption in the menu to the right and select a format for submitting yourassignment.
- Click the Submit Assignment button when you are ready.
Rubric
Concorde Rough Draft Rubric
Concorde Rough Draft Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Ideas
20.0ptsIdeasare clear, insightful, thought provoking, and focused so that theyconsistently support the topic, thesis, and audience of the paper.
13.0ptsIdeasare clear and focused to support the topic and a clearly stated centralidea but are not consistently insightful or thought provoking.
7.0ptsIdeas are clear but conventional or general and support the topic, thesis, and audience for the paper.
5.0ptsIdeasare unclear or clichéd and demonstrate a lack of focus in support of thetopic or a central idea, which might be vague or missing.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Development
20.0ptsDevelopmentis fresh, with abundant details and examples that arouse audienceinterest and provide relevant, concrete, specific and insightfulevidence in support of sound logic.
13.0ptsDevelopmentis adequate but might lack depth, with details and examples that arouseaudience interest and provide relevant, concrete, specific evidence insupport of sound logic.
7.0ptsDevelopmentis sufficient but general, providing adequate but perhaps notinteresting details, examples, and evidence that include no logicalfallacies or unsupported claims.
5.0ptsDevelopmentis insufficient, providing scarce or inappropriate details, evidence,and examples that might include logical fallacies or unsupported claims.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
20.0ptsOrganizationis coherent, unified, and effective in support of the paper’spurpose/plan and consistently demonstrates effective and appropriaterhetorical transitions between ideas and paragraphs. Full Marks
13.0ptsOrganizationis coherent, unified, and effective in support of the paper’spurpose/plan and usually demonstrates effective and appropriaterhetorical transitions between ideas and paragraphs.
7.0ptsOrganizationis coherent and unified overall in support of the essay’s purpose/plan,but is ineffective at times and might demonstrate abrupt or weaktransitions between ideas or paragraphs.
5.0ptsOrganizationis confused and fragmented in support of the essay’s purpose/plan anddemonstrates a lack of structure or coherence that negatively affectsreadability.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle and Mechanics
20.0ptsStyleis readable and rhetorically effective in tone, incorporating variedsentence structure, precise word choice, and correct grammar, spelling,and punctuation. (Mastery of style)
13.0ptsStyleis readable and rhetorically effective in tone, incorporating variedsentence structure, effective word choice, and correct grammar,spelling, and punctuation. (Effective style)
7.0ptsStyleis readable but unremarkable in tone, sometimes including a lack ofsentence variety effective word choice, or some distracting, but notserious, errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. (Readable butinconsistent style)
5.0ptsStyleis incoherent or inappropriate in tone, including a lack of sentencevariety, ineffective or inappropriate word choice, and serious errors ingrammar, spelling, and punctuation. (Ineffective style)
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat and Citations
20.0ptsFormatis correct, meets all assignment directions, and works expertly tosupport the paper’s purpose/plan. All resources are formatted in currentAPA style with no more than two errors.
13.0ptsFormatis correct, meets all assignment directions, and works generally tosupport the paper’s purpose/plan. All resources are formatted in currentAPA style with three to five errors.
7.0ptsFormatis mostly correct, meets critical aspects of assignment directions, andworks mostly to support the paper’s purpose/plan. Most resources areformatted in current APA style with more than five errors.
5.0ptsFormatis faulty, does not meet sufficient aspects of the assignmentdirection, and does not support the paper’s purpose/plan. Resources arenot formatted in APA style with extensive errors.
20.0 pts
Total Points:100.0
