Premium Tutors

This I9s For A Rough Draft For A Research Paper For Econ 211

Hi,

The outline is already completed for this paper. The title of this paper is The Impact of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017

After you have written your outline, you will initiate work on thefirst draft of your paper. While the draft is not expected to includeall of the points that you will have in your final paper, it mustprovide enough detail so that the general scope and depth of the finalpaper is clear. Your final paper must be at least 1,800 words andinclude six or more credible sources. Two of your sources must be fromacademic journals.

Your first draft must include the following four sections:

  • An introduction that introduces the selected topic and discusses how the analysis was conducted.
  • A literature review that provides a detailed summary of the economiccircumstances and facts that serve as the foundation of the economicanalysis.
  • A narrative body that includes:
    • An economic analysis that uses the tools developed in the coursealong with your graphical depiction of the economics applied to yourtopic. Provide an explanation of the graphical analysis. Don’t leave itto the reader to figure out your intention. The specific analysis willdepend on your chosen topic.
    • Statistics that support your topic and narrative.
  • Conclusion and a brief summary.

Use current APA formatting for your paper including these elements:

  • Title page
  • Running head
  • Page numbers
  • Headings
  • Source citations
  • Reference list

An abstract and table of contents are not required.

Remember to use the Eaglet and APA resources provided on the Academic Resources page.

Note: Your paper will automatically be evaluatedthrough Turnitin. Turnitin is a service that checks your work forimproper citation or potential plagiarism by comparing it against adatabase of web pages, student papers, and articles from academic booksand publications. Ensure that your work is entirely your own and thatyou have not plagiarized any material! Your draft paper will not bestored in the Turnitin repository.

You will submit your first draft in Module 6. Review the assignment rubric for detailed grading criteria.

Here is the grading rubic:

ECON 211 Module 6 Draft Research Paper Rubric

ECON 211 Module 6 Draft Research Paper Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFocus – Application of Economic Theory

10.0ptsPapermakes great use applying economic theory to the topic (explaining theeconomics in the issue), includes economically logical conclusions,student excels at predicting future economic trends, events orconclusions based on the reasoning used.

8.0ptsPapermakes good use applying economic theory to the topic (explaining theeconomics in the issue), may include basic economically logicalconclusions/projections.

5.0ptsPaperincorporates economic theory in explaining the topic (explaining theeconomics in the issue.) Little more than stating the economic theory isincluded. No use of economically logical conclusions.

3.0ptsPapermakes no application of economic theory to the topic. Is justdescriptive of the topic in nature. Provides no evidence studentconnected economic theory to topic.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInclusion of Course Learning Outcomes

10.0 ptsPapermakes great use of course material, readings, and supplements. Easilymaps to a number of learning outcomes in the syllabus.

8.0ptsPapermakes good use of course material and readings. Little outsidesupplements are included. Maps to a number of learning outcomes in thesyllabus.

5.0ptsPapermakes basic use of course material. Typically no outside supplements orresearch in included. Difficult to map to a number of learning outcomesin the syllabus.

3.0ptsPapermakes no real constructive use of course material. One could considerthis an opinion paper with no real supporting material. Difficult to mapto a number of learning outcomes in the syllabus.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInclusion of Supporting Data

10.0ptsPaper contains evidence of solid research effort drawing from many strong academic sources.

8.0ptsPaper contains evidence of medium research effort in number and strength of resources.

5.0ptsPaper contains evidence of minimal research effort or success drawing from few or weak sources (Wikipedia).

3.0ptsPaper contains evidence of no real research effort including no real source of research.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Statistical Evidence

10.0ptsPaper makes exemplary use of credible statistical evidence.

8.0ptsPaper makes good use of credible statistical evidence.

5.0ptsStatistical evidence is partial, weak or inappropriate.

0.0ptsNo statistical evidence is presented.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStrength of Argumentation

10.0ptsThesis is well developed and supported, feeds conclusion. Contradictory views plausibly handled.

8.0ptsThesisis adequately developed and supported, only partially supports theconclusion. Contradictory views not treated adequately.

5.0ptsThesis is not adequately developed and logically supported, conclusion not supported. Contradictory views not treated.

3.0ptsThesis is not developed or supported. Conclusion missing or not supported. Contradictory views not treated adequately.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences

15.0ptsReferencesare well documented in both the body and reference section in aconsistent form. Many more than the minimum number of sources.

12.0ptsReferencesare inconsistently documented in body and reference section. Referencesare not ideally matched to content. Five sources and at least threejournals contained.

8.0ptsReferencesare poorly documented in body and reference section. References notappropriate to content or not current. Less than minimum requirements.

5.0ptsAlmostno references documented. Inappropriate references. Fewer than fivesources or fewer than three journal articles. Reliance on nonquality websources.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar

10.0ptsWriting is grammatically correct, clear and flowing.

8.0ptsWriting should be polished for stronger presentation.

5.0ptsWriting needs work for clarity, organization and grammatical presentation.

2.0ptsClear indication that this is a draft with serious need for review and editing.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling

5.0ptsNo spelling errors that distract the reader from the content.

4.0ptsLess than 1% of word total have errors in spelling that distract the reader from content.

2.0ptsFrequent (3-4%) spelling errors that distract the reader from content.

0.0ptsSignificantly more than 4% spelling errors that distract the reader from the content.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFlow of Thesis and Arguments

10.0ptsOrganization is logical and easy to follow. Includes introductory overview and supportable conclusion.

8.0ptsOrganization is evident but could be strengthened.

5.0ptsOrganization is weak. Introduction and conclusion are not clearly delineated in body of work.

3.0ptsOrganization is almost nonexistent and represents just a free flow of ideas.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format

10.0ptsAPA style is employed perfectly.

8.0ptsFew errors in APA style and most are inconsequential.

5.0ptsMany features of APA style are ignored.

0.0ptsAPA style ignored completely.

10.0 pts

Total Points:100.0

Looking for this or a Similar Assignment? Click below to Place your Order

× How can I help you?